Oregon Military Divorce Computes Marital Share with Highest Pay Grade
|2013 Law Case: WILLIAM LEE MALPASS vs EMILY F. MALPASS – Court of Appeals
An Oregon military divorce case filed, February, 13, 2013 has ruled that the proper calculation of the marital share of the division of military income be based on the service member’s highest pay grade. This is a big win from the perspective of the military spouse and can set precedent for future USFSPA law cases, especially in Oregon.
Army Divorce Case: Malpass vs Malpass Information:
- Husband (service member) joined the Army in 1997
- Year of marriage: 2000
- Year of divorce: 2010
- Expectations at time of divorce: husband to serve another seven (7) years in the Army and then retire
- Original USFSPA ruling: division of military retired pay (marital property) was computed based on date of divorce
2013 Outcome:
Daniel Margolin of Stephens Margolin P.C., Portland, Oregon (representing the spouse) successfully argued that the highest pay grade should be used to calculate the marital share figure in the division of a military retirement income, regardless of the date of divorce.
Details:
The military spouse filed an objection to the military retirement pay division being calculated based on the day of marriage dissolution:
Wife objected, arguing that the pension should be divided in accordance with our opinion in Kiser and Kiser, 176 Or App 627, 32 P3d 244 (2001) (rejecting the husband’s suggestion that the trial court award the wife 50 percent of the monthly payout that he would receive if he retired at the date of dissolution and requiring, instead, that the court look to the value of the benefit at retirement).
In Kiser, the husband argued that “the trial court should award [the] wife 50 percent of the monthly payout he would receive if he retired at the date of dissolution.” 176 Or App at 631 (emphasis added). We rejected that approach, stating that, “when retirement benefits have not matured and are thus not presently liquid, it is equitable to look to the value of the benefit at retirement.”
Citing Kiser, we concluded that the court erred: “[U]nder Oregon law, the marital [share] portion of [the] husband’s pension must be calculated as a fraction of the entire actual pension, rather than as a fraction of a hypothetical pension amount.” source
The original decision was reversed and remanded that the marital share of husband’s military pension be computed as a fraction of the entire actual pension and adjust wife’s survivor benefits accordingly.
Equitable Divorce Solutions
The computation of marital share is a complicated issue. The book, Military Divorce Tips, discusses in detail the three options for computing the division of retirement pay in accordance to the requirements of the USFPSA and the logic usually presented when each choice is argued for computing marital share.
- Use the rank on date of divorce,
- Use the pay grade on date of retirement, or
- Use a hypothetical formula (based on a hypothetical retirement date)
This 2013 ruling in the case of the Army service member Malpass vs Malpass will help set precedent for future cases. The issue concerns more than rank at retirement. There are some cases where service members try to finalize the decree prior to pinning on ceremonies in attempt to limit the amount received by the soon-to-be former spouse.
Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP):The ruling also awarded an equal adjustment to the Survivor Benefit Plan, ensuring that the former spouse would continue to receive the division of pay as an annuity should the service member pass away. Death is another area that former military spouses should discuss with their attorney prior to completion of the divorce decree.
Keep Calm and Call Your Lawyer Tshirts by keep_calm_and
Submit Oregon Military Divorce Cases
You can contribute additional 2013 (or prior year) Oregon divorce information using our submission form.
Comments: In addition to SBP, this Oregon case also involved the child tax exemption (which we may address in the future). To keep our discussions targeted, please only add comments on this page concerning the retirement pay division.
Try these books to learn more about the division of your estate — your marital property in divorce.
Gee, how ALL these “Gimme MY share that I’VE earned” problems could be totally prevented, just by repealling the USFSPA and keep former military spouses in a group THEY’VE ALWAYS BELONGED TO – non-military spouses depending on public welfare, etc ! ! ! – – – Eh ! – (Look that up in your “Funk & Wagnalls” ! )
Do you think they would do this with her 401k if you are lucky to get anything out of it. I want my part(ha ha) of her 401k and I want it at pay out after more years contribution not at the time of divorce and I want covered it by an life insurance poilcy at her expense. I can see it now, well Sir that is not how it works that would that would almost be fair and we can’t have that. I mean all you did is protect this nation, live with the real possibiality of dying at any time, be gone from your kids and extneded family. How can that compare the hardship she faced at home, with no one trying kill her, a roof with over head with cable tv all the food and beer her and her boyfriend could handle.
Typical bs work around the rules to screw every service member you can
This is STINKING EQUINE EXCREMENT ! – The “envelope” has been pushed far beyond the breaking point ! This is an insult to every career military member. The court has done INdirectly what it CANNOT do DIRECTLY ! This calls for federal court intervention to declare this UNconstitutional !